Many of these states dont participate in campaign visits or get televised ads. It would eliminate the Congressional provisions for a non-majority election. Lastly, it may cause a third-party candidate to prevail and win, which would allow Americans to be given more choices besides the two primary parties (Richards). The National Popular Vote effort, explained The National Popular Vote effort is now halfway to its goal of electing future presidents via the popular vote, after Rhode Island Gov. This would happen in the extremely unlikely situation where this candidate would win just for one vote in some . Second, some believe itll intensify election problems, such as illegally extended voting hours or irregularly high voter turnout (Richards). In fact, let's tally up all the votes cast for president between 1932 and 2008. Advantages and Disadvantages of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact In the 2016 Presidential Election if the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact had been in effect the winner of the national popular vote, Hillary Clinton, would have become president instead of Donald Trump. The National Popular Vote stems from the winner-take-all approach that validates the presidential candidate interactions with only 4 out of 50 dates during their campaign. 2. 1. Using a popular vote system, candidates could campaign regionally, targeting major areas of support, to secure enough votes to win an election. List of the Cons of Using the Popular Vote 1. Bosque de Palabras 3. In the 2020 election California did not certify their votes until Friday, December 11, only 3 days before the Electoral College met on Monday, December, 14. The cost of a presidential election in the United States is already several billion dollars. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact collectively apportions votes to the winner of the overall popular vote without a constitutional amendment abolishing the electoral college or the assent of Congress. 6. Under the current structure of presidential elections in the U.S., the states become a battleground of red states vs. blue states. It is also true that no president since 1824 has received the votes of a majority of the eligible voters and 18 presidents, including Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Harry S. Truman, John. 6. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Instead, each state and Washington D.C. is assigned a certain number of electoral votes based on its population. On Dec. 22, 2016, the results were certified in all 50 states. cons of the national popular vote planchicago religious demographics. Imperfect, because its modern-day blessings -- enhancing coalition building, pluralism, federalism and grass-roots participation -- are enjoyed only by a minority of states (in any given presidential election 18 or 20), where the battle for electoral votes is competitive for both major parties. National Popular Vote - Pros and Cons "The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the entire U.S. evergreen funeral home live stream. Even though we will be able to elect the president by national popular vote using the The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, eventually the rules for how we elect the president should be an official part of the Constitution. and our As of December 2020, the National Popular Vote bill has been adopted by 15 states and the District of Columbia, controlling 196 electoral votes: CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, HI, IL, MA, MD, NJ, NM, NY, OR, RI, VT, and WA. The NPV movement seeks to create an unfair and unconstitutional system that diminishes the voting rights of citizens throughout the country and raises the prospect of increased voter fraud and. 4. Past Event: The League of Women Voters of Berrien and Cass Counties has announced plans to broadcast a webinar discussing the National Popular Vote (NPV) on Monday, Feb. 27 at 7:00 p.m. National Popular Vote has been leading the campaign to fix the electoral college and elect the president by national popular vote since its founding in 2006 . But we're closer to that than you might think 15 states and the District of Columbia have already signed on, providing 196 electoral votes of the needed 270. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of electors who represent each state's votes. Candidates feel these states need a little bit more of their attention and apply pressure to supply these states with solutions to their problems in order to gain their vote. How the National Popular Vote Plan Would Work. All other votes cast for that candidate are therefore superfluous. Retrieved from https://samploon.com/electoral-college-and-national-popular-vote-pros-and-cons/, Should the Electoral College Be Abolished, Pros for The Electoral College in the United States, Electoral College is Undemocratic but We Have no Better System, The Electoral College Should Be Terminated, The Electoral College Annotated Bibliography. To pass an amendment to change the Constitution the Founding Fathers wisely required approval by 2/3 of both houses of Congress and 3/4 of the state legislatures instead of a simple majority. Probably the NPV Compact would be enacted into law with as little as a simple majority of the states and possibly even less. And thats not how it should be in a democracy. Most recently, the bill was passed by a bipartisan 4016 vote in the Republican-controlled Arizona House, 2818 in Republican-controlled Oklahoma Senate, 574 in Republican-controlled New York Senate, and 3721 in Democratic-controlled Oregon House." If the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact becomes law it would be an excellent first step to help get a future amendment to the Constitution to replace the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system to elect the president with a national popular vote using Ranked Choice Voting. The first problem it creates is the opportunity for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote. Today the Democrats want to replace the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system with a direct popular vote and the Republicans adamantly want to keep it. Unless the national popular vote was very close, or there were all lot of recounts outstanding, the Compact states in most cases would effectively know what the outcome would be and could be prepared to certify their state votes very quickly to make the Electoral College meeting date deadline. (2021, Jun 14). Proportional Plan That created a voter value of 2.85. Under the electoral college system of voting, the number of representatives a state has in Congress (Senators and Representatives) is the total number of electoral votes it is allowed. Under the National Popular Vote plan,the compact would take effect only when enabling legislation has been enacted by states collectively possessing a majority of the electoral votes:270 of 538 total. Advantage: Encourages Voter Turnout The National Popular Vote (NPV) refers to the concept of allocating a state's presidential electors to the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide regardless of the state results in a presidential election. Going to the popular vote would eliminate this issue altogether. Our experts will write for you an essay on any topic, with any deadline and requirements from scratch, Electoral College and National Popular Vote Pros and Cons. The National Popular Vote plan would eliminate what critics of the Electoral College system point to as the "winner-take-all" rule - the awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in that state. Although moving to a popular vote election would balance the weight of each vote, it would also create more sway in larger population states. The winner would receive all of the compact states electoral votes, giving them at least the necessary 270 to win the White House. The last amendment, the 27th Amendment to the Constitution, was ratified nearly 200 years after it was originally proposed. That's almost 1.5 billion . For example, if a candidate was very popular in New York City, Los Angeles and other large cities, she might not need to earn votes from other areas of the country. Or states might explore what was recently proposed in Colorado -- that electors be allocated in proportion to each candidate's share of the popular vote above a certain threshold. And unlike direct elections, either would provide an incentive for grass-roots activity, coalition building and enhanced citizen participation. The first advantage allows for electoral votes to be fairer than the Electoral College (Richards). 8. It has been enacted into law in 11 states with 165 electoral votes, and will take effect when enacted by states with 105 more. By continuing well assume youre on board with our, https://samploon.com/electoral-college-and-national-popular-vote-pros-and-cons/, Select a writer from a large pool of experts. Samploon is a database of free essay samples. tobin james the blend 2017 ; real estate marketing solutions; cons of the national popular vote plan; lassi kefalonia shops cons of the national popular vote plan It would reduce the influence of third parties on the U.S. presidential election. America is known to have the costliest, prolonged, and complicated structure when electing a head of state. Even if states impose fines on faithless electors for their actions, it is not a guarantee that the behavior will stop. A candidate could be elected without the popular vote. The NPV Interstate Compact does not eliminate the very complicated Electoral College system that most voters dont really understand. Web. The Congressional District method would allocate electoral votes based on the winner of each congressional district. Before the 2016 election, the largest vote deficit in the popular vote was Al Gore securing over 500,000 votes more than George W. Bush. The danger of NPV is that it will undermine the complex and vital underpinnings of American democracy. A plan to enact the National Popular Vote was introduced in the Michigan Legislature on Wednesday. But if some non-member Then, election officials in all participating states would choose the electors sworn to support thepresidential candidate who received the largest number of popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. E pluribus unum -- out of many, one. In the 2016 election, "swing states" that might vote Republican or Democrat like Wisconsin were targets of candidates Donald J. Trump and Hillary R. Clinton. As of now, 15 states and Washington, D.C. have joined the National Popular Vote compact: Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington, New Jersey, Illinois, New York, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Delaware and Oregon. That nightmare may seem like a pleasant dream if NPV has its way. It fails to reach the ideal of one-person one-vote. This type of system would give the individual voter a much more significant influence. Maryland and New Jersey passed this bill in 2007, Hawaii and Illinois in 2008, Washington in 2009, Massachusetts and the District of Columbia in 2010, California and Vermont in 2011, Rhode Island in 2013, New York in 2014 and Connecticut in 2018. 3. The National Popular Vote plan is a bill passed by participating state legislatures agreeing that they will cast all of their electoral votes for the presidential candidate winning the nationwide popular vote. Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? And finally, the Electoral College doesnt work today anywhere near how the Founding Fathers intended it to work when they created it back in 1787. The National Popular Vote Bill is a bill for Americans interested in both preserving our Electoral College and reforming the shortcomings of our current "winner-take-all" system that awards all the electors of one state to the candidate who wins in that particular state and . Post author: Post published: June 29, 2022 Post category: Uncategorized Post comments: paris apartment eiffel tower view for sale paris apartment eiffel tower view for sale every decade states are redistricted could be redrawn to capture house seats and corrupt the Presidential election It could help to reduce partisanship. Note: Today we are in a phase where the popular vote in presidential elections leans Democratic. That means the cost of counting all the votes would be duplicated. Cookies collect information about your preferences and your devices and are used to make the site work as you expect it to, to understand how you interact with the site, and to show advertisements that are targeted to your interests. We have seen this outcome in the 2016 Presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and in the 2000 election between George H.W. However, in the popular vote, Trump only received 62,984,825 votes against Hillary Clinton's 65,853,516 popular votes. It is perhaps the most simplistic form of an election. 1, 2023 at 1:16 PM PST. Over the years, the National Popular Vote bill has been introduced in the legislatures of all 50 states. The electoral college leads to a heavy emphasis on swing states and also typically over-represents citizens in rural states. In U.S. history, there has been one vice-presidential candidate who died after being nominated and one that withdrew from their partys ticket. what connection type is known as "always on"? A popular vote system would significantly impact voters and turnout.